Click here for the original journal page (in Acrobat pdf format).

The text below is grayed out because it is not intended to be read. It is a necessarily imperfect OCR of the original and is only used by a search engine.


Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 53(3), 1999, 99-103

AN EXAMINATION OF INTRASEASONAL VARIATION IN THE INCIDENCE OF MELANISM IN PEPPERED MOTHS, BISTON BETULARIA (GEOMETRIDAE)

Bruce S. Grant

Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795, USA

AND

Cyril A. Clarke

Emeritus Professor of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

ABSTRACT. We examined daily catch records of peppered moths (Biston betularia) taken over a forty-year period to determine whether melanic and pale forms of this species fly at the same or different times within seasons. We also compared the emergence rates of the two forms from reared broods to determine whether differences in developmental rates might contribute to intraseasonal flight patterns. Although melanic phenotypes develop slightly faster than their typical siblings in some laboratory broods, the field records show no consistent pattern for one phe-notype being more common than the other early or late in the same summer. The work is discussed in the context of industrial melanism for which this species is the classic example.

Additional key words: cognataria, f. carbonaria, industrial melanism, f. swettaria.

Industrial melanism is a familiar textbook example of observable evolution brought about by natural selection. The term pertains to increases in the frequencies of genetically determined melanic versus pale phenotypes in populations living in habitats modified by regional industrial development and urbanization. The phenomenon has been well documented in many species of Lepidoptera; however, attention has focused primarily on the peppered moth, Biston betularia (L) (Geometridae). The broad aspects of the subject have been reviewed recently by Majerus (1998), Sargent et al. (1998), and Grant (1999).

The corpus of experimental work to date is consistent with the interpretation that selective predation on the moths by birds is the primary, though not exclusive, force driving the changes in the frequencies of peppered moth phenotypes (Majerus 1998). Ket-tlewell (1955, 1956) provided the first quantitative evidence that birds eat the different color phases of peppered moths according to their conspicuousness on different backgrounds. His mark-release-recapture experiments also demonstrated that the melanic phenotypes fared better than the pale forms in soot-blackened woodlands; whereas, the pale forms fared better than the melanics in unpolluted woodlands.

Kettlewell (1973) entertained other possibilities beside selective predation that might contribute, at least in part, to the high incidence of melanism in moth populations living in the vicinities of British industrial centers. He speculated that larvae developing in the early part of the summer feed on leaves that are less contaminated by industrial pollutants than are the older leaves that larvae feed on later in the summer.

From his observations of larval developmental rates, he proposed that pale peppered moths, as fast developers, avoided pollution, and/or that the melanics, as slow developers, "may be capable of getting rid of toxic substances." He cited no reference to support his statement that "slow feeding and a capacity for excreting noxious materials has been demonstrated . . . outside the Lepidoptera" (Kettlewell 1973:85).

Unfortunately, Kettlewells developmental analysis of peppered moths was limited to one brood that was partially consumed by mice, and a second brood that provided "no corroboration of the earlier results." He also acknowledged that he could provide no evidence from samples of wild populations that industrial melanic forms change in frequency during the flight period within single seasons. However, he did discuss intraseasonal changes in phenotype frequencies for several other moth species which show what he called "ancient" (^stable polymorphism) melanism. For example, pale Amathes glareosa increase late in the season (the melanics appear early on); whereas, Chora repandata melanics increase, relative to pale forms, as the season progresses.

In analyses of seasonal catch records of other moth species polymorphic for melanic forms, Bishop et al. (1978) concluded that melanic Gonodontis bidentata emerged later than pale forms, and Sargent (1983) reported slight increases in melanism during the second half of seasons in Phigalia titea. As only field data were available from these studies, clear distinctions between selection on the adults and developmental differences in emergence schedules between the phenotypes were not possible. Equally problematical, S. Poitout (cited

100

Journal of the Leptdopterists' Society

Table 1. June (=A) and July ( mon between 1959 through 1998,

=B) catch records of B. betularia phenotypes (Mel. = melanics, T+I = typicals and f. insularia) at Caldy Com-The phenotypic distributions during June and July of each year are compared by G-tests of independence.

Year

Mel

T+I

G

Year

Mel

I±l

G

Year

Mel

Til

G

Year

Mel

T+l

G

59A

174

15

 

69A

349

25

 

79A

387

111

 

89A

52

114

 

59B

90

4

1.46

69B

216

20

0.67

79B

111

23

1.72

89B

13

40

0.91

60A

178

11

 

70A

658

68

 

80A

379

115

 

90A

36

68

 

60B

34

2

70B

112

10

0.18

80B

103

40

1.30

90B

15

35

0.33

61A

161

18

 

71A

109

8

 

81A

118

46

 

91A

102

337

 

61B

240

12

4.45*

71B

79

11

1.75

81B

178

65

0.08

91B

139

355

2.93

62A

159

17

 

72A

45

3

 

82A

43

15

 

92A

227

750

 

62B

588

38

2.56

72B

202

26

1.26

82B

45

19

0.22

92B

32

111

0.05

63A

725

67

 

73A

102

14

 

83A

219

111

 

93A

41

146

 

63B

185

18

0.03

73B

181

21

0.21

83B

226

133

0.88

93B

22

65

0.37

64A

238

25

 

74A

99

14

 

84A

172

105

 

94A

39

196

 

64B

335

37

0.03

74B

178

22

0.14

84B

43

32

0.56

94B

26

87

2.01

65A

361

40

 

75A

78

16

 

85A

189

144

 

95A

33

149

 

65B

70

7

0.06

75B

155

20

1.60

85B

271

256

2.34

95B

13

66

0.11

66A

163

18

 

76A

129

29

 

86A

213

198

 

96A

5

78

 

66B

110

8

0.93

76B

242

46

0.05

86B

169

225

6.78**

96B

12

106

1.12

67A

123

10

 

77A

68

12

 

87A

141

201

 

97A

12

165

 

67B

243

21

0.02

77B

360

50

0.46

87B

41

61

0.03

97B

5

56

68A

209

26

 

78A

91

28

 

88A

44

66

 

98A

14

113

 

68B

216

26

0.01

78B

205

31

5.92*

88B

29

40

0.07

98B

12

87

0.07

*p <

0.05

                           

**p <

0.01

                           

by Bishop et al. 1978) showed in laboratory strains of Spodoptera exigua that melanic genotypes had a longer total development than non-melanic genotypes; thus melanic individuals tended to emerge from pupae later than the non-melanics, but no field data were reported.

The above studies serve to illustrate that generalities are not obvious regarding developmental differences and/or in intraseasonal variations in flight patterns between melanic and pale forms of polymorphic moth species. Therefore, we have analyzed the flight patterns in B. betularia directly, and compared the emergence rates of melanic and pale phenotypes. To determine if melanic and pale phenotypes fly at different times during the summer, we examined the daily catch records of peppered moths taken at a single location over a forty-year period. To assess potential differences in emergence schedules, we recorded the eclo-sion sequences of melanic and pale phenotypes from three large broods produced from controlled crosses.

Materials and Methods

Field studies of intraseasonal flight patterns.

Bistort betularia were collected near Caldy Common,

West Kirby, England over a period of 40 years, beginning in 1959. The original purpose of the study was to assess frequency changes in the melanic, pale, and intermediate phenotypes over the course of years; these annual changes have been reported elsewhere (see Clarke et al. 1985, 1994, Grant et al. 1996, 1998). To determine if the different phenotypes fly at different times during the same season, we reexamined the daily catch records for each of the 40 years moths were trapped at this location.

Each season a mercury vapor (MV) light trap was operated nightly from 1 June through 31 July. When virgin females were available, an assembling (phero-mone) trap was also used. No difference in the proportions of the phenotypes caught by one trapping method or the other has ever been observed (Clarke et al. 1994), but the incidental use of the assembling trap does increase the total catch size. For our analysis, therefore, we subdivided each season into early and late halves based on calendar date (June versus July) rather than by the mid-point (median) of the total numbers of the moths caught within seasons. We then tabulated the numbers of each phenotype caught during the first and second halves of each season. The null

Volume 53, Number 3

101

(D

100 90 80 70 60 50 -\ 40 30 20 i 10 0

**a

"V

'V

59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98

Year

Fig. t. The decline in the frequency of melanic B. betularia between 1959 through 1998 at Caldy Common, West Kirby, England, plotted from June samples (solid symbols) and from July samples (open symbols).

hypothesis is that there should be no difference in the percentage of melanics caught in the early and in the late samples taken during the same summer.

Laboratory experiments on differential emergence. To determine if differential emergence (time to eclosion) of melanic versus pale phenotypes exists, we crossed known heterozygous melanic B. betularia cognataria to their pale siblings. (The expected ratio of pales to melanics among the progeny from such mat-ings is 1:1.) The stock material was produced by a melanic female crossed to a pale male, both of which were caught at the same location in Pennsylvania in 1996, and the crosses used in our experiments were made using their progeny which emerged in the spring of 1997.

In all, three sets of siblings were crossed, and their broods were subdivided to avoid overcrowding. The caterpillars were housed inside plastic "garbage cans" and were provided a continuous supply of fresh leaves from a single, large Chiswell crab apple tree (Malus spp.). The caterpillars pupated "at will" in moistened beddings in the bottoms of their containers. The pupae were then stored in containers lined with moistened paper towels. All storage containers were checked daily to remove newly emerged adults until the experiment was terminated several weeks after emergences ceased entirely and no living pupae remained. For each brood, each moth to emerge was identified by phenotype and sex and the date of its emergence.

Results

Field studies. From 1959 through 1998, 18,255 Bistort betularia were collected near Caldy Common.

The year-to-year sample sizes varied widely, ranging between 122 to 1120, with an average annual catch of 456 ± 257. The early and late halves (June vs. July) of seasons also varied widely with respect to sample sizes, with mean catches at 259 ± 206 and 197 ± 143, respectively. The differences between the early and late sample sizes, though large, are not statistically significant by paired samples t-tests (t = 1.622, df = 39, p = 0.113), nor by the non-parametric Wilcoxons signed-ranks test (p = 0.226).

The complete set of catch records, subdivided by early (A = June) and late (B = July) catches, are summarized by phenotype in Table 1. In the table, the melanics (f. carbonaria) are separated from the other phenotypes (pale = f. typica or "typicals" and intermediates = f. insularia). The intermediates have remained rare at Caldy Common (for complete data through 1993 see Clarke et al. 1994), therefore the combined category (T+I) is essentially "typical" (pale), or non-melanic.

Sample sizes permitting, the numbers of melanics and non-melanics collected during the first half and second half of each season were compared using 2x2 contingency G-tests of independence. The G statistics are listed in Table 1. Of the 38 comparisons made, only three showed significant differences in the phenotypic proportions between the early and late halves of the same season; in two instances the melanics increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the second half of the season, and in one instance the melanics declined very significantly (p < 0.01) during the second half of the season. In 35 of the 38 comparisons, no significant differences in the proportions of melanics between the early and late subsamples within seasons were observed.

To test for the possibility that small but consistent differences might exist within seasons (differences too slight to be detected by G-tests), we analyzed the entire 40-year record by Wilcoxons signed-ranks test. The null hypothesis is that the differences in the percentages of melanics collected during first and second halves of seasons are random. The data show that the percentage of melanics increased during the second half of summers 23 times, and decreased 17 times (Fig. 1), but the differences are not significant by Wilcoxons signed-ranks test (p = 0.55).

Between 1977 and 1997 the annual incidence of melanism declined rapidly at Caldy Common (Fig. 1), and for several years during this same period, there appeared to be a short run of seasons in which the percentage of melanics decreased in the second half of summers compared to the first half. However, the pattern is not consistent throughout the period of rapid annual decline in melanism, and the differences in

102

Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

Table 2. Early and late emergences from reared broods of B. hetularia cognataria from crosses expected to produce 1:1 ratios of melanic and pale (typical) phenotypes. The phenotypic distributions between the early and late groups within each brood are compared by G-tests of independence.

Brood

 

Melamcs

Typicals

G

A

Early Late'

53 49

46

36

0.31

B

Early Late

30 16

23 29

4.37*

C

Early Late

27 23

27 30

0.47

**p < 0.05

melanic frequencies between first and second halves of seasons are not significant by Wilcoxons signed-rankstest (p = 0.82).

Differential emergence. We recorded the emergence date, sex and phenotypes of all adults produced by the three crosses of heterozygous melanics mated to their pale, homozygous siblings. Eclosion patterns within broods generally begin with one or a few adults emerging from puparia on the initial day, then the number of daily emergences increases quickly and peaks a few days later, after which the daily emergences tail off until finally many days may separate the stragglers from the main group and from each other. The null hypothesis of our experiment is that the difference in emergence sequence within broods is not related to the color phenotypes; therefore, the proportions of melanics and typicals should be the same in the first half of a brood to emerge as in the second half.

We divided each brood into early and late groups using the median. All of the moths emerging up to and including the day the first half of the total emergences for the brood was reached were assigned to the early group, and all of the moths emerging after that day were assigned to the late group. Table 2 lists the early and late emergences by phenotype (melanic and typical) for each of the three broods. The numbers of melanics and typicals emerging during the early and late periods are compared within broods by 2 x 2 contingency G-tests of independence. The G statistics are also listed in the table. In brood B, melanics are significantly more common in the early than in the late group (p < 0.05), but no significant emergence differences are apparent in the other two broods.

DISCUSSION

The data from Caldy Common provide little support for the idea that the different phenotypes of Bistort hetularia fly at different times of the season. That three of the 38 contingency tests indicated significant

intraseasonal differences between the phenotypic proportions is consistent with type-I error rates expected when large numbers of statistical comparisons are made (Sokal & Rohlf 1981). Furthermore, only two of the three observed significant deviations from random expectations were skewed in the same direction which further supports that these exceptional years can be attributed to chance. Of these three exceptional years (1961, 1978, 1986), only 1986 shows a very pronounced deviation in phenotypic proportions between the early and late halves of a season, and in this instance the significant decline in the proportion of melanics occurred during the brief run of intraseasonal declines in melanism that occurred during those years of the steepest declines in the annual incidence of melanism. Here, at least, it seems reasonable to suggest that selection at the adult stage rather than developmental differences in emergence schedules might account for the drop in melanism within that season.

Differences in emergence schedules between melanic and pale peppered moths are slight, at best. Of the three broods we examined, only one showed significantly accelerated emergence of the melanics versus their typical siblings. Different broods, no doubt, emerge throughout the normal season of several months, and if developmental differences, however slight, between melanics and pale forms are consistent, then, in the absence of offsetting selection at the adult stage, we should expect to observe a consistent bias favoring melanics earlier in the summer. Clearly this did not happen over the 40 years of observations at Caldy Common.

Our developmental studies in the laboratory employed the North American subspecies, B. hetularia cognataria, and our field studies centered on the British subspecies of peppered moths, B. hetularia hetularia. Direct comparisons between the two must be qualified. American "pale" or typical forms are generally much darker than British typicals; however, the melanics (called f. carhonaria in Britain and f. swet-taria in America) are phenotypically indistinguishable, and are caused by alleles at the same locus (Grant & Clarke in prep.). The melanics, both in America and Britain, have also shown parallel increases (Owen 1962) and decreases (Grant et al. 1995, 1996) in frequencies associated with environmental modifications related to industrial development and urbanization. The reductions in melanism on both continents are now widespread (Grant et al. 1998).

The phylogenetic relationship (Rindge 1975, Clarke et al. 1993), and the genetics of melanism in these subspecies (West 1977, Grant & Clarke in prep.), and the

Volume 53, Number 3

ecological events coincidental to the parallel evolutionary changes in phenotype frequencies (Grant et al. 1996, 1998) combine to suggest that we are observing the same basic phenomenon in peppered moth populations on both sides of the Atlantic. While we must remain cautious in extrapolating what we learn from the study of one subspecies to draw conclusions about the other, we also recognize that what we learn from one subspecies might be instructive in our study of the other. In this instance, there again appears to be agreement: No consistent intraseasonal flight pattern differences between pale and melanic British peppered moths are apparent, nor are the differences in emergence schedules of pale and melanic American peppered moths consistent among broods.

Our study does not address one of Kettlewells (1973) suggestions that differences in developmental rates might exist among the larvae of different genotypes that produce pale and melanic adult phenotypes. No clear relationship between emergence rates between melanic and pale peppered moths and the time the forms spend as larvae has ever been established; therefore, our study on emergence sequences does not bear directly on the question of the seasonal conditions early and late larvae might experience. However, there is evidence that B. betularia co gnat aria is bivol-tine (Owen 1962, Manley 1981); therefore, larvae of those genotypes producing melanic and pale adults in the first versus the second generations of summers must endure late and early summer conditions, respectively, as they feed and develop. Yet, there is no evidence that the proportions of melanic and pale adults change consistently between the first and second broods of summers (Owen 1962, Manley 1981). These observations do not support Kettlewells speculations that selection at the larval stage influences melanism at the adult stage.

We do not consider this a "negative results" paper. There has been much speculation about the relevant ecological factors and the putative selective agents responsible for industrial melanism, and now its decline (recently critiqued by Majerus 1998, Sargent et al. 1998, and Grant 1999). The occasional but recurring query that intraseasonal variation in the frequencies of the forms may offer some insights can, in our view, be laid to rest. Part of the process in identifying what is important from what is not involves the process of elimination. We hope we are making progress.

103

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean Butler, Winifred Cross, Sally Thompson, and Angela Urion for assistance with population sampling at Caldy Common, and the Nuffield Foundation for funding the fieldwork. We also thank Annie Harvilicz for assistance in feeding caterpillars. Deane Bowers, Laurence Cook, Theodore Sargent, Ward Watt, and Lawrence Wiseman helped us improve this report by their comments on an earlier draft. We dedicate this paper to the memory of Lady Feo Clarke.

Literature Cited

Bishop, J. A., L. M. Cook & J. Muggleton. 1978. The response of two species of moths to industrialization in Northwest England: I. Polymorphism for melanism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 281:489-442.

Clarke, C. A., G. S. Mani & G. Wynne. 1985. Evolution in reverse: clean air and the peppered moth. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26:189-199.

Clarke, C. A., F. M. M. Clarke & B. Grant. 1993. Biston betularia (Geometridae), the peppered moth, in Wirral, England: an experiment in assembling. J. Lepid. Soc. 47:17-21.

Clarke, C. A., B. Grant, F. M. M. Clarke & T. Asami. 1994. A long term assessment of Biston betularia (L.) in one UK locality (Caldy Common near West Kirby, Wirral), 1959-1993, and glimpses elsewhere. Linnean 10:18-26.

Grant, B. S. 1999. Fine tuning the peppered moth paradigm. Evolution 53:980-984.

Grant , B., D. F. Owen & C. A. Clarke. 1995. Decline of melanic moths. Nature 373:565.

----------. 1996. Parallel rise and fall of melanic peppered moths in

America and Britain. J. Hered. 87:351-357.

Grant, B. S., A. D. Cook, C. A. Clarke & D. F. Owen. 1998. Geographic and temporal variation in the incidence of melanism in peppered moth populations in America and Britain. J. Hered. 89:465-471.

Kettlewell, B. 1973. The evolution of melanism. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Kettlewell, H. B. D. 1955. Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9:323-342.

----------. 1956. Further selection experiments on industrial

melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 10:287-301.

Majerus, M. E. N. 1998. Melanism: evolution in action. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

Manley, T. R. 1981. Frequencies of the melanic morph of Biston cognataria (Geometridae) in a low-pollution area of Pennsylvania from 1971 to 1978. J. Lepid. Soc. 35:257-265.

Owen, D. F. 1962. The evolution of melanism in six species of North American geometrid moths. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 55:695-703.

Rindge, F. H. 1975. A revision of the New World Bistonini (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156:69-155.

Sargent, T. D. 1983. Melanism in Philgalia titea (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): a fourteen-year record from Central Massachusetts. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 91:75-82.

Sargent, T. D., C. D. Millar & D. M. Lambert 1998. The classical explanation of industrial melanism. Evol. Biol. 30:299-322.

SOKAL, R. K. & F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd. ed., Freeman, San Francisco.

West, D. A. 1977. Melanism in Biston (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in the rural Central Appalachians. Heredity 39:75-81.

Received for publication 11 November 1998; revised and accepted 16 December 1999.