The text below is grayed out because it is not intended to be read. It is a necessarily imperfect OCR of the original and is only used by a search engine.
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 35(1), 1981, 51-60
A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF EMBRYONIC
INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN TWELVE
SPECIES OF LEPIDOPTERA
Charles G. Oliver
R.D. 1, Box 78, Scottdale, Pennsylvania 15683
ABSTRACT. Inbred (sib-sib) matings were made in population cultures of twelve species of Lepidoptera (Boloria bellona, B. selene, Phyciodes tharos, P. batesii, P. campestris, Junonia coenia, Pararge aegeria, P. megera, Pieris rapae, Arctia caja, and Cisseps fulvicollis) and the resulting loss of egg hatchability was compared with control, outbred matings in the same cultures. A relatively extensive series of inbred matings within a single population of Phyciodes tharos revealed that embryonic genetic load is composed of very few, strongly deleterious genetic units. This seems to be true of all of the lepidopteran species tested. Genetic load values for nine of the species seemed homogeneous and varied between 0.5 and 2.0 lethal equivalents per zygote. There was only a single value for the tenth species; this may be anomalous. Two species of the group seem to have significantly lower and higher genetic loads than the other species. This may be a result of differences in population structure.
Genetic variation within populations and species theoretically has a highly adaptive role in enabling the organism to respond to varying environmental stress (e.g., Dobzhansky, 1970). However, a portion of this variation (the "genetic load") consists of genes that, when expressed, result in a loss of fitness for the carrier. Since segregation and recombination in sexual, non-selfing organisms lead inevitably to the production of disadvantageous homozygotes, each population presumably must strike a balance between population size and structure (and thus levels of inbreeding) on the one hand and size of the genetic load on the other. Under conditions such as the laboratory, where close inbreeding suddenly becomes the rule, genetic load is expressed as inbreeding depression. Comparative studies on inbreeding depression in different species and populations within species should provide information on the composition of genetic loads and eventually enable some general inferences to be drawn on the species' natural levels of inbreeding and population structure. This paper represents a preliminary attempt to estimate genetic loads for a small, heterogeneous group of lepidopteran species.
The magnitude of the genetic load in a population is usually estimated by observation of the reduction from normal survivorship during a given sensitive period (i.e., during a time of rapid tissue development and growth) in development of progeny from a series of matings of a known degree of inbreeding. This approach has been used for populations of Drosophila (e.g., Dobzhansky et al., 1963), Douglas-fir (Sorenson, 1969), humans (Morton et al., 1956), and domestic animals (Pisani & Kerr, 1961; Sittmann et al., 1966). A second method has been used for Drosophila. This uses genetic markers as
52
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
a means of estimating the frequencies in a population of chromosomes bearing lethal and sublethal genes. When both methods are used simultaneously on the same Drosophila populations (e.g., Dobzhansky et al., 1963; Malogolowkin-Cohen et al., 1964) the former method gives a consistently lower result, indicating synergism among the components of the load. Because of this synergism, estimates of load magnitude made under conditions of intense inbreeding can be considered only as relative values. However, the intensity of inbreeding in the present experiments was less than that necessary to produce significant synergism (Kosuda, 1972) and should reflect actual levels of genetic load.
During the course of breeding work involving maintenance of twelve species of Lepidoptera (Boloria bellona bellona Fab., B. se-lene Schiffermiiller (ssp. myrina Cramer and sabulocollis Kohler), Phyciodes tharos tharos Drury, P. tharos pascoensis Wright (probably best considered a separate species (Oliver, in prep.)), P. batesii Reakirt, P. campestris Behr (ssp. montana Behr), Junonia coenia coenia Hiibner (all Nymphalidae); Pararge aegeria L. (ssp. tircis Butler), P. megera megera L. (Satyridae); Pieris rapae rapae L. (Pieridae); Arctia caja caja L. (Arctiidae); and Cisseps fulvicollis Hiibner (Cte-nuchidae)) at various times during a period of ten years, I took the opportunity of making observations on control and inbred broods reared under the same conditions and usually simultaneously. I have made estimates of the magnitude of genetic load in each population culture from a comparison of survivorship of progeny from control and inbred matings. In these species by far the greatest expression of genetic load occurs during embryonic development (Oliver, unpub. data). Data on embryonic survivorship is also much easier to gather than that on later life stages. For these reasons this paper considers only embryonic viability among the twelve species.
Unfortunately, there is little hard data on the population structure of these species. P. t. tharos has a wide range of habitats and is generally abundant; there is good evidence for near panmixis over the eastern United States (Vawter & Brussard, 1975). P. t. pascoensis is more habitat-restricted and tends to show significant population differentiation (Oliver, in prep.); P. c. montana probably has a similar population structure. P. batesii in the northeastern United States occurs in small, highly isolated populations (Oliver, 1979). My field observations indicate that P. megera (Oliver, 1972b) and P. aegeria show little individual motility and tend to occur in localized populations, as do B. selene, B. bellona, and C. fulvicollis. A. caja is common and general in central Europe; P. rapae is abundant in almost all open areas in the eastern United States. /. coenia is a highly vagile
Volume 35, Number 1 53
species that tends to form large colonies which may often be founded by single fecundated females (e.g., Shapiro, 1978).
Almost nothing is known about the composition of the genetic load in Lepidoptera. If the heterozygosity involved in genetic loads is similar to the great genie variation that has been observed in natural populations of most organisms (Lewontin, 1974; Richmond, 1972), including butterflies (Burns & Johnson, 1967), then the chances are very small of picking at random even two parents having a level of variation differing significantly from the population average. The data of Dobzhansky et al. (1963) seem to support this view; no correlation was found between viability and pedigree in a long series of inbred Drosophila cultures. However, when lethals or semilethals are involved, very high levels of inbreeding depression may be due to the actions of only a few genes.
Methods
One to six cultures were maintained for each species. Detailed information on culturing techniques has been given in earlier papers (Oliver, 1972a, 1972b, 1977, 1978, 1979). Each culture was begun from parents caught in a separate locality. Embryonic survivorship in the progeny from inbred matings between siblings (coefficient of inbreeding, F, = .250) was compared with that from control, outbred intrapopulation matings ("combined controls" in Table 1). In each case the siblings used were the progeny of an outbred (usually wild) intrapopulation mating having normal hatchability.
Each of the cultures was begun with a comparatively small number of wild parents, from 2 to 22. Because of uncertainty regarding the reliability of data from very small population samples, the program was carried out in two parts. The first (Part A) consisted of observations on cultures of all species maintained from 1968 to 1978, the second (Part B) of a more systematic set of inbred matings made during 1973 and 1975 using a population of Phyciodes tharos from western Pennsylvania. In this part six isofemale families were established and 9 to 14 successful sibling pairings made within each family. An additional two families (73-23 and 73-31) were derived by outcrossing the Ft progeny of the original wild parents of these families. Sib matings were then made within each of these two additional families.
Cultures were begun from individuals caught at the following localities:
Boloria b. bellona—Massachusetts: Acton, Middlesex Co.; Pennsylvania: Forward
Twp., Allegheny Co. B. selene myrina—MASSACHUSETTS: Acton, Middlesex Co. B. s. sabulocollis—South Dakota: Custer Park, Custer Co.
TABLE 1. Mean hatchability of eggs and embryonic genetic loads (L. E./zygote) in control a of inbreeding (F) = 0 for controls (c); (F) = .250 for inbred (i) broods.
Species & provenance
No. of broods
No. of wild parents
No. of eggs
Colored/laid1-
B. bellona Pennsylvania (c) Massachusetts (c) Combined c Pennsylvania (i)
B. selene Massachusetts (c) Massachusetts (i) South Dakota (i)
P. tharos Florida (c) Virginia (c) West Virginia (c) Massachusetts (c) Connecticut (c) Combined c Florida (i) Texas (i) West Virginia (i)
P. pascoensis Montana (c) Alberta, Canada (c) Combined c Montana (i) Alberta, Canada (i)
P. campestris California (c) California (i)
1 4 1 1 11
3 2
10
2 2
2 4 2 2 10
2
2 2
33 173
403
1160 692 741
272
1011
362
648
1606
945
137
2412
945 113
305 751
562 406
|
1.000 |
|
|
.954 |
|
|
.916 ± .074 |
|
|
.960 ± .037 |
|
|
.775 ± .118 |
|
|
.830 ± .221 |
|
|
.864 |
|
|
.990 ± .011 |
|
|
.983 |
|
|
1.000 |
|
|
.995 ± .006 |
|
|
.941 ± .061 |
|
|
.856 ± .144 |
|
|
.962 ± .048 |
|
|
.983 ± .028 |
|
|
.965 ± .035 |
|
|
.788 ± .181 |
|
|
.730 ± .146 |
|
|
.000 ± .000 |
|
|
.788 |
P. batesii New York (c) New York (i)
/. coenia Florida (c) Florida (i)
P. aegeria Hampshire, United Kingdom (c) Hampshire, United Kingdom (i)
P. megera Oxford, United Kingdom (c) Boulogne, France (c) Combined c
Oxford, United Kingdom (i) Boulogne, France (i)
P. rapae Pennsylvania (c) Pennsylvania (i)
C. fulvicollis Connecticut (c) Massachusetts (c) Texas (c) Iowa (c)
South Dakota (c) Combined c Connecticut (i) Massachusetts (i) Texas (i) Iowa (i) South Dakota (i)
A. caja N.W. Germany (c) N.W. Germany (i)
|
5 |
8 |
2533 |
|
1 |
2 |
100 |
|
1 |
2 |
208 |
|
3 |
2 |
1373 |
|
2 |
4 |
33 |
|
3 |
2 |
106 |
|
3 |
4 |
161 |
|
2 |
4 |
146 |
|
2 |
2 |
307 |
|
2 |
2 |
102 |
|
3 |
6 |
334 |
|
28 |
6 |
2186 |
|
7 |
14 |
546 |
|
1 |
2 |
171 |
|
1 |
2 |
223 |
|
6 |
12 |
1417 |
|
6 |
12 |
367 |
|
14 |
12 |
2185 |
|
3 |
2 |
516 |
|
9 |
2 |
1673 |
|
11 |
4 |
2415 |
|
1 |
2 |
248 |
|
5 |
? |
4628 |
|
11 |
p |
10,587 |
1 Showing visible evidence of embryonic development.
2 Mean ± standard deviation given if no. of broods >1.
|
.938 ± .099 |
||||
|
.950 |
||||
|
1.000 |
||||
|
.998 ± .002 |
||||
|
.931 ± .069 |
||||
|
.655 ± .406 |
||||
|
.973 ± .019 |
||||
|
.910 ± .025 |
||||
|
.870 ± .119 |
||||
|
.938 ± .062 |
||||
|
.956 ± .008 |
||||
|
.894 ± .105 |
||||
|
.984 ± .030 |
||||
|
1.000 |
||||
|
.996 |
||||
|
.985 ± .015 |
||||
|
.914 ± .091 |
||||
|
.924 ± .057 |
||||
|
.975 ± .006 |
||||
|
.963 ± .047 |
||||
|
.962 ± .027 |
||||
|
.911 |
||||
|
.936 ± .055 |
||||
|
.861 ± .159 |
||||
56
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
Phyciodes t. tharos—Florida: 4 mi. E of Cedar Key, Levy Co.; Texas: San Antonio, Bexar Co.; West Virginia: Spruce Knob, elev 4500 ft, Pendleton Co.; Pennsylvania: Upper Tyrone Twp., Fayette Co.
P. t. pascoensis—Montana: 1 mi. S of Hall, Powell Co.; Alberta, Canada: 6 mi. E of Nordegg, Red Deer.
P. campestris montana—California: Lang Crossing, elev 4500 ft, S. Fork Yuba R., Nevada Co.
P. batesii—New York: Syracuse, Onondaga Co.
Junonia c. coenia—Florida: Wauchula, Hardee Co.
Pararge aegeria tircis—England: Pamber Forest, Hampshire.
P. m. megera—England: Oxford, Oxfordshire; France: Boulogne-sur-Mer.
Pieris r. rapae—Pennsylvania: Upper Tyrone Twp., Fayette Co.
Arctia c. caja—Northwest Germany.
Cisseps fulvicollis—Connecticut: Woodbridge, New Haven Co.; Massachusetts: Littleton, Middlesex Co.; Texas: San Antonio, Bexar Co.; IOWA: Dubuque, Dubuque Co.; South Dakota: Custer Park, Custer Co.
Observations on embryonic survivorship included counts of eggs showing evidence of embryonic tissue differentiation (a darkening of egg color from pale yellow or green to brown or black) and of eggs hatching. An increase in failure to show embryonic development in the inbred broods was taken as evidence of very early embryonic mortality. There is a possibility that there was lowered fertilization rate of eggs in the inbred matings, but the males used in these matings were of the same age and condition as those used for laboratory control matings. Eggs from these control matings showed fertility equal to that from wild-fecundated females. Both visible fertility and incidence of egg hatch are combined under the term "hatchability."
The Wilcoxon Two-Sample Statistic (Owen, 1962) was used to compare differences in hatchability of broods in Part B. Calculations of load magnitude were made using the equations presented by Freire-Maia (1964), which are a simplification of those of Morton et al. (1956). Since the comparison is between inbred and control broods with F = 0, it is possible to use Freire-Maia's equation
R _ log(Sj/Sc)
-0.4343F, where B is the magnitude of the genetic load in lethal equivalents per zygote; S{ and Sc denote the mean survivorship of the inbred and control broods, respectively; and Fi is the coefficient of inbreeding of the inbred group. Morton et al. (1956), who used the term "mutant" to refer to any gene deleterious when homozygous, defined lethal equivalent (L. E.) as "a group of mutant genes of such number that if dispersed in different individuals, they would cause on the average one death, e.g., one lethal mutant, or two mutants each with a 50 per cent probability of causing death, etc."
Volume 35, Number 1
57
Results
The results of Part A are shown in Table 1. In every species inbreeding caused a significant reduction in hatchability, but the amount varied greatly from one population and species to another. In the control broods hatching failure was due in the great majority of cases to infertility rather than to embryonic inviability. In the inbred broods, however, there were usually substantial reductions in both the incidence of visible embryonic development and in late embryonic viability. There was interspecific and interpopulation variation in the inbred broods in the proportion of mortality occurring before and after visible evidence of embryonic development. Variation in inviability was many times higher for the inbred broods than for the controls. The amount of variation was not a function of the magnitude of inbreeding depression. There were large differences between species and between populations in the size of the genetic load (L. E./zygote calculated from total hatchability) and of the standard deviation in viability observed for each series of broods.
The results of Part B are shown in Table 2. Hatchability within each family line of this population of Phyciodes tharos varied greatly, but only the family showing the least inbreeding depression (75-3) differed significantly (P < .005) from those showing the greatest (73-23, 73-31, 75-4).
Discussion
The degree of interbrood variation in hatchability (indicated by standard deviation) shown within each family line of P. tharos and the other Lepidoptera used here reveals that genetic loads in these species consist mainly of relatively few genetic units with strongly deleterious effects when homozygous. These genetic loads do not seem directly to reflect the genie variation that has been shown to occur in Lepidoptera.
Fig. 1 shows the distribution of L. E./zygote values for the 85 inbred P. tharos broods summarized in Table 2. The graph consists of four main peaks, with values clustered at or near 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 L. E./ zygote. A distribution of this type could result from the action of only several strongly deleterious (i.e., lethal) recessive genes in each family, perhaps along with a few much weaker sublethals.
In Table 2 there is a considerable spread in L. E. values, even though only the very lowest value is significantly different from the highest. Thus, there is a spread on either side of the mean of about 0.7 L. E./zygote that is not significant here. If we assume for the
58
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
Table 2. Mean embryonic genetic loads expressed in Ft progeny of sib-sib matings in 8 lines of Phyciodes tharos from Upper Tyrone Township, Pennsylvania.
|
No. of |
No. of |
No. of |
|||
|
Family line |
broods |
wild parents |
eggs |
Hatched/laid1 |
L. E./zygote |
|
controls |
12 |
24 |
3037 |
.993 ± .011 |
|
|
73-1 |
14 |
2 |
5884 |
.765 ± .154 |
1.043 |
|
73-4 |
9 |
2 |
2459 |
.803 ± .184 |
0.850 |
|
73-23 |
9 |
4 |
2663 |
.596 ± .272 |
2.041 |
|
73-31 |
9 |
4 |
2595 |
.591 ± .146 |
2.076 |
|
75-1 |
12 |
2 |
3749 |
.779 ± .132 |
0.971 |
|
75-2 |
11 |
2 |
3046 |
.683 ± .172 |
1.494 |
|
75-3 |
12 |
2 |
3021 |
.888 ± .113 |
0.448 |
|
75-4 |
9 |
2 |
2571 |
.671 ± .190 |
1.623 x = 1.318 |
1 Mean ± standard deviation.
moment that this amount of variation applies also to the other species in Table 1, all except P. batesii, J. coenia, and C. fulvicollis probably fall within the normal range of P. tharos and form a fairly homogeneous group. The single value for P. batesii falls at the upper limit of values for P. tharos (above 98.81% of values in Fig. 1), but this single sample cannot be considered significant. All three values of J. coenia are at the lower level for P. tharos; there is a less than .001 chance of any three randomly picked values of P. tharos from Fig. 1 all falling this far to one end of the graph. The overall mean L. E./ zygote value for C. fulvicollis falls at the upper end of the graph. From this it seems likely that C. fulvicollis and at least this population of/, coenia carry genetic loads that are, respectively, larger and smaller than those of the other species. A very small genetic load would seem adaptive for the inbred populations resulting from the sort of colonization events that occur in/, coenia. Too little is known about the population structure of C. fulvicollis to speculate on the comparatively large genetic load it carries.
The lethal equivalent values calculated here are generally in line with those estimated for other insects. One to two L. E./zygote have been estimated (by survival from egg to adult) for Drosophila (Dip-tera) (Dobzhansky et al., 1963; Stone et al., 1963; Malogolowkin-Co-hen et al., 1964) and for Tribolium (Coleoptera) (Levene et al., 1965). For humans a value of 3 to 5 L. E./zygote (by survival from birth to sexual maturity) has been established by Morton et al. (1956), whereas embryonic loads in Douglas-fir average about 10 L. E./zygote (Sor-enson, 1969). In none of these organisms has a definite relationship been shown between magnitude of load and population structure. The general similarity of load magnitude among the very different
Volume 35, Number 1
59
N:85 F : .250
00.1
1.01.1
2.0-2.1 3.0-3.1
GENETIC L0AD(L.E./ZYG0TE)
O-LLn
4.0-4.1
9.2-93
Fig. 1. Distribution of embryonic genetic loads in lethal equivalents per zygote in 85 inbred broods of Phyciodes tharos from Upper Tyrone Township, Pennsylvania.
insects thus far examined may indicate that genetic loads are more related to some internal genetic balancing responsible for the metabolic integration of the individual organism than to population structure. However, there are surely situations (as in species colonizing by single fecundated females) where adjustment of load magnitude is highly adaptive.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to C. L. Remington, Thomas Uzzell, and Wyatt W. Anderson for discussions of the early stages of this work, and to E. G. Leigh, Bruce Wallace, and the late Theodosius Dobzhansky for their very helpful suggestions and comments on various versions of the manuscript. Portions of this research were supported by funds provided by the Department of Biology, Yale University, and by a Grant-in-Aid of Research from the Society of the Sigma Xi.
Literature Cited
Burns, J. M. & F. M. Johnson. 1967. Esterase polymorphism in natural populations
of a sulfur butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Science 156: 93-96. Dobzhansky, Th. 1970. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia Univ. Press,
New York. 505 pp. ---------, B. SPASSKY, & T. Tidwell. 1963. Genetics of natural populations. XXXII.
Inbreeding and the mutational and balanced genetic loads in natural populations
of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 48: 361-373. Freire-Maia, N. 1964. Estimate of the genetic load disclosed by inbreeding. Genetics
50: 527-529. KOSUDA, K. 1972. Synergistic effect of inbreeding on viability in Drosophila virilis.
Genetics 72: 461-468.
60
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
Levene, H., I. M. Lerner, A. Sokoloff, F. K. Ho & I. R. Franklin. 1965. Genetic
load in Tribolium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 53: 1042-1050. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia Univ.
Press, New York. 346 pp. Malogolowkin-Cohen, Ch., H. Levene, N. P. Dobzhansky & A. Solima-Simmons.
1964. Inbreeding and the mutational and balanced loads in natural populations of
Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 50: 1299-1311. Morton, N. E., J. F. Crow & H. J. Muller. 1956. An estimate of the mutational
damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
(U.S.A.) 42: 855-863. Oliver, C. G. 1972a. Genetic and phenotypic differentiation and geographic distance
in four species of Lepidoptera. Evolution 26: 221-241.
--------- 1972b. Genetic differentiation between English and French populations of the
satyrid butterfly Pararge megera. Heredity 29: 307-313.
--------- 1977. Genetic incompatibility between populations of the nymphalid butterfly
Boloria selene from England and the United States. Heredity 39: 279-285.
--------- 1978. Experimental hybridization between the nymphalid butterflies Phy-
ciodes tharos and P. campestris montana. Evolution 32: 594-601.
1979. Experimental hybridization between Phyciodes tharos and P. batesii
(Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 33: 6-20.
Owen, D. B. 1962. Handbook of Statistical Tables. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 580 pp.
Pisani, J. F. & W. E. Kerr. 1961. Lethal equivalents in domestic animals. Genetics 46: 773-786.
Richmond, R. C. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. III. Amounts of variability in the superspecies D. paulistorum. Genetics 70: 87-112.
SHAPIRO, A. M. 1978. A new weedy host for the buckeye, Precis coenia (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 32: 224.
Sittmann, K., H. Abplanalp & R. A. Fraser. 1966. Inbreeding depression in Japanese quail. Genetics 54: 371-379.
Sorenson, F. 1969. Embryonic genetic load in coastal Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga men-ziesii var. menziesii. Amer. Natur. 103: 389-398.
Stone, W. S., F. D. Wilson & V. L. Gerstenberg. 1963. Genetic studies of natural populations of Drosophila: Drosophila pseudoobscura, a large dominant population. Genetics 48: 1089-1106.
Vawter, A. T. & P. F. Brussard. 1975. Genetic stability of populations of Phyciodes tharos (Nymphalidae: Melitaeinae). J. Lepid. Soc. 29: 15-23.