The text below is grayed out because it is not intended to be read. It is a necessarily imperfect OCR of the original and is only used by a search engine.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1968
|
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
|
53
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ILLUSTRATED LIFE HISTORY AND NOTES ON PAPILIO OREGONIUS
Stephen F. Perkins, Edwin M. Perkins, Jr. and F. Stuart Shininger Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon
The life history of Papilio oregonius Edwards 1876, described by Newcomer (1964), has not heretofore been illustrated. The accompanying photographs and legends are self-explanatory (Figs. 1-11).
The rearing of large numbers of larvae necessitated the establishment of criteria by which the instars could be quickly and accurately distinguished. The following is a resume of these characteristics:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
'%>
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
I'-
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ll b & m
Figs. 1-9. Early stages of Papilio oregonius Edwards. Fig. 1. Egg lateral aspect. Diameter—1.2 mm. Fig. 2. Same dorsal aspect. Fig. 3. First instar larva. Length— 5.5 mm. Fig. 4. Second instar larva. Length—8 mm. Fig. 5. Third instar larva. Length—16 mm. Fig. 6. Fourth instar larva. Length—28 mm. Fig. 7. Fifth instar larva. Length—45 mm. Fig. 8. Pupa, dorsal aspect. Length—32 mm. Fig. 9. Same, lateral aspect.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||
|
54 Perkins et al.: Papilio oregonius Vol. 22, no. 1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
ZT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fig. 10. Adult, 150', ll-VI-62 (S Perkins, Jr.).
|
$ Papilio oregonius Edwards, F. Perkins). Fig. 11. Adult,
|
The Dalles, Wasco County, Oregon. 9 P. oregonius. Same data (E. M.
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||
|
1968
|
Journal of the hepidopterists Society
|
55
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
f^PL v
|
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Fig. 12. Spanish Hollow Canyon, .5 mi W. Biggs, Sherman County, Oregon. 250' (looking north toward Columbia River and bluffs of Washington). Fig. 13. Same locale depicting Papilio oregonius foodplant (Artemisia dractmculus).
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
56
|
Perkins et al.: Papilio oregonius Vol. 22, no. 1
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Papilio oregonius was originally described on the basis of a single female sent to W. H. Edwards by Henry Edwards (not Morrison) from The Dalles, Wasco County, Oregon (Figs. 10 and 11 are topotypes).
Two broods of Papilio oregonius occur in Oregon: adults are on the wing from mid-May to June and from July to mid-September. In Oregon, the authors have encountered Papilio oregonius along the length of the Columbia River, east of The Dalles, i.e., in Wasco, Sherman, Gilliam, Morrow and Umatilla counties. Here in arid, sage-covered country it flies about its foodplant, Artemisia dracunculus L., or frequents the hot, wind-swept lower canyons, (Figs. 12 and 13). During five seasons of field work captures from flowers (Cirsium and Vicia) represent less than one percent of our captures.
Occasional records also originate from canyons of the upper plateau, including Jefferson and Baker counties (which represent the southernmost, verified Oregon records).
Some of the finest collecting areas in Oregon have vanished in recent years because of highway construction, floods and rising waters due to new dams along the Columbia River. If the Oregon swallowtail is as hardy and adaptable as its foodplant, Papilio oregonius will likely be little affected.
Literature Cited
Newcomer, E. J., 1964. Life Histories of Papilio indra and P. oregonius. Jour. Res. Lepid.,*3(l): 51-54.
|
|||
|
|
|||